What is the Advantage and Disadvantage of rotary maize header

Forage Harvesters: Elevating Livestock Feed Quality

In the realm of agricultural machinery, forage harvesters stand out as champions of efficiency and productivity. These versatile machines play a crucial role in the production of high-quality silage and cow feed, offering numerous advantages over alternative methods. Let's delve into the compelling reasons why forage harvesters are the preferred choice for farmers seeking optimal results in their harvest operations.

If you want to learn more, please visit our website.

What are the Advantages of Forage Harvesters?

1. Forage Harvesters are Super Efficient

Forage harvesters excel in efficiency, swiftly and effectively processing crops such as maize/corn, grass, and various other crops crucial for livestock feed and silage production. Unlike traditional harvesting methods, which can be time-consuming and labor-intensive, forage harvesters streamline the process, allowing farmers to accomplish more in less time. By leveraging advanced technologies and precision engineering, these machines empower farmers to achieve unprecedented levels of productivity in significantly reduced timeframes. This efficiency not only enhances operational effectiveness but also enables farmers to optimize resource allocation and ultimately increase their overall output and profitability.

3. Forage Harvesters are versatile in Crop Handling

Forage harvesters are incredibly versatile machines that can handle a wide range of crops, whether they're standing tall or lying flat in the field. Whether it's maize/corn, grass, or other type of crops, these machines are adept at efficiently harvesting and processing the crop. They can easily adapt to different field conditions and crop types, making them invaluable tools for farmers working with diverse agricultural landscapes.

Xinwanda are exported all over the world and different industries with quality first. Our belief is to provide our customers with more and better high value-added products. Let's create a better future together.

Related links:
Best Corn Head for Down Corn: Essential Tips 2025

4. Forage Harvesters Enhance Nutrient Preservation

Compared to traditional harvesting methods, which may result in nutrient loss due to prolonged exposure to air and weather conditions, forage harvesters excel in preserving the nutritional content of the forage. By quickly chopping the crop and ensiling it promptly, these machines help lock in essential nutrients, ensuring that the feed maintains its quality over time.

The superior quality of feed produced by forage harvesters translates into improved animal health and performance. Cattle fed with high-quality forage experience better digestion, nutrient absorption, and overall well-being, leading to higher milk yields and enhanced profitability for dairy farmers.

Scottville, Northwest MichiganI currently own a straw walker machine. But have owned a rotary combine in the past. I suspect the rotaries are more productive and efficient. Talked briefly today with the owner of our closest Lexion dealer. He says all they've ever sold were rotaries, they've never sold a straw walker.

Is this one of those personal prejudices or bias's? Or are rotaries generally considered superior? Are the any circumstances where straw walker's are considered to have an advantage?

I'm really curious to hear your pros and cons on this subject.




thanks, gordon

Sunburst Montana

I had the same prejudice against rotaries on the straw issue.  But after running rotaries since I don't anymore.  Nieghbor has been running rotaries for 30 years and they seem to get by just fine with the straw.  The cows don't seem to care if the straw comes out of a rotary or conventional.  Only thing I notice is it takes more straw out of a rotary to equal the straw you would get out of a conventional.  Thats not a problem for us since we have more then enough barley acres to bale up.  And round balers have come along way in the last 10 years in their ability to bale rotary straw.  Our 568 and the 457 we had before never have any problems.   

If you are looking for more details, kindly visit rotary maize header.

Edited by Steiger Man 11/20/ 00:19



Statesville, NCI have always thought walker machines might use less fuel than a rotary for the same amount of bushels or acres, since the rotors are tearing up the straw more and that takes energy. I may be wrong since the output of the rotaries is so much more. Has anyone compared fuel consumption of rotary vs. walker in corn, wheat, and soybeans?

Elizabethtown,KYTrent - 11/19/ 21:47

I have always thought walker machines might use less fuel than a rotary for the same amount of bushels or acres, since the rotors are tearing up the straw more and that takes energy. I may be wrong since the output of the rotaries is so much more. Has anyone compared fuel consumption of rotary vs. walker in corn, wheat, and soybeans?

I had a before my and now a , fuel consumption was about the same in corn, but the rotaries burn way less fuel running beans than the did.

NW WashingtonThe short coming of walker combine is walker losses. If you push them too much the losses will go up very fast. Rotary combines use more power and their losses will rise at a linear rate if over loaded and in most cases their capacity is limited by engine power. Notice that bigger rotary machines usually just have more power than the lower capacity models. Rotary machine are better corn shellers and they do less damage to the harvested crops like beans.
So, here is North America where corn is king and beans are big so are rotary combines. In Europe where very little corn is harvested for grain and cereal crops are often harvested relatively high moisture and straw is often saved rotary combines are few and far between. Most of their walker machines now have a tined separator drum or cylinder behind the main cylinder to separate more grain before the straw gets to the walkers, like the NH CX series in this link.

http://agriculture.newholland.com/au/en/Products/Harvesting-Equipme...

EC KansasThe Lexion rotors are not the same as the single axial rotors. Walkers are completely different animals. Each machine - walker (JD - New Holland - Lexion ) - single rotor (New Holland twin rotors - JD STS - CIH axials ) - hybrid rotor (JD CTS/Lexion ) has it special place and use, alot of which is outlined above. Don't confuse a single rotor as being the same as a Lexion/CTS. Too many people try to compare a single rotor with a hybrid or waler and expect comparable results.

Northern CAI bale alot of the straw out of our Gleaner rotary machines. The only time the straw ever being chopped up more (and yes, one of our machines even has a chopper on it that we bale behind ), is for the retail / feed store market for horse customers. They like the longer straw better. But, the guys that feed straw or have cattle, like the rotary straw better. I think it might just depend on your straw market.